WEEK IX WORDS etc
'GRAVIA
ET DUBITABILIA' ('weighty but debatable matters' in Magna
Carta)
GUALO WILLIAM
MARSHAL (d. 1219) TREATY OF KINGSTON, 1217
4th LATERAN COUNCIL, 1215
STEPHEN LANGTON, ABP OF CANTERBURY ROBERT GROSSETESTE, BP
OF LINCOLN (d. 1253)
SIMON DE MONTFORT, EARL OF LEICESTER (d. 1265)
FRIARS DOMINICANS
FRANCISCANS
'BRACTON', Name given to legal treatise 'DE LEGIBUS'. Now known that
HENRY DE BRACTON, J. was NOT the author, and that it was originally
written in the 1220s
'QUOD PRINCIPI PLACET HABET VIGOREM LEGIS' (= 'What pleases the king
has the vigor of Law'), Roman Law maxim.
ACCURSIUS, author of the Ordinary Gloss on the CORPUS IURIS CIVILIS,
1229-34.
POITEVINS (from Poitou) and SAVOYARDS (Savoy)
PETER DES RIVAUX LUSIGNAN Family (Aquitaine)
MATTHEW PARIS, monk, chronicler from St. Albans
'NATURALES' (= native born)
COMMUNITY OF THE REALM 'MAGNA NEGOTIA REGIS ET REGNI' (The
great business of the king and real)
PARLIAMENT PLENA POTESTAS (full powers,
authority) 'SELF-GOVERNMENT AT
THE KING'S COMMAND'
ELEANOR OF PROVENCE, Henry III's Queen from 1236
[ST.] LOUIS IX, KING OF FRANCE, 1228-70
ENQUETES (Name give to admin inquiries in 1240s,
1250s )
'MAD PARLIAMENT' 1258, with PROVISIONS OF OXFORD
PROVISIONS OF WESTMINSTER 1259
MISE OF AMIENS, 1264
STATUTE OF MARLBOROUGH, 1267
MURDRUM FINE, abold. 1259
ACTION OF TRESPASS
CHIEF JUSTICIAR
BATTLE OF LEWES, 1264
BATTLE OF EVESHAM, 1265
DICTUM OF KENILWORTH, 1266
THE
NOBILITY REFUSES THE KING AN AID, 1242
Just before the
Purification of the Blessed Virgin, the nobility of all
England, prelates, earls and barons, assembled in London by royal
command...They refused the king to his face, because they were
unwilling any longer to be despoiled of their money to no purpose. So
the king, familiar with the sly frauds of the Romans, called each man
individually into his private chamber one after the other the way a
priest calls in penitents to confession. And so, those whom he could
not weaken as a group, he tried to trick one by one. In quest of a
money aid, he said: "This is what that abbot there granted me in aid;
this is what such and such other man gave."...But many stood firm as
they had sworn to each other, and would not withdraw from their
collective response.
Matthew
Paris, iv. 181-2 (Stubbs, Select
Charters, iv. 181-2). Matthew's use of the verb 'coniuraverunt'
(often meaning 'conspired') in the final sentence of the extract,
suggests disapproval.